ThreatPaper
Weak Evidence

The Danfoss flaw used in the attack has been identified

Assessment

A person close to PM Lecornu told AFP that ANSSI had 'identified a vulnerability' in the Danish vendor's software, and the French firm Synacktiv said an authentication bypass it reported in 2023 and 2025 'could be linked' to the attack, while Claroty Team82's August 2026 research documented a code-of-the-day auth bypass (CVE-2025-41450) and command injection (CVE-2025-41451) on the AK-SM 800A. None of this establishes the vector actually used: CERT-FR named no CVE, firmware version or entry route and published no indicators, Danfoss said most affected units were older models not covered by those advisories, and experts described the attack as opportunistic. The documented flaws are context for why the surface was exposed, not a confirmed cause of this incident.

Where this claim appeared

Génération-NT · 2026-10-13

https://www.generation-nt.com/actualites/cyberattaque-supermarches-france-danfoss-refrigeration-securite-2082732

What “Weak Evidence” means

Evidence exists but is thin, circumstantial, or explicitly qualified as weak by the source that published it. Shared hosting infrastructure between threat clusters is the recurring example.

3 of 5 · rating scale

Assessed in

French supermarket cyberattack: Danfoss fridge controllers forced into defrost, stock spoiled, fires reported

Think this assessment is wrong? Report an error.